This article is a year old, but I only just came across it. And I havent actually read it. Still, the title itself proposes an interesting perspective about our current Art vs. Tech situation.

I've mentioned it elsewhere. I think AI is potentially the source of some really severe cultural flattening, which you could also call catastrophic and epidemic mediocrity. Potentially. Obviously nobody knows, nobody can know. 

The more important thing is that, even if such a flattening never happens, mail art is an important force against this type of thing. And a technique of bypassing it. We make things ourselves, personal expressions of our own individual way of seeing and being, and we send them to each other to experience directly and individually. No electronic interference. No distractions. Tactile and optical interaction with the aura of another human being's eccentric and inimitable expression of how they experience this bizarre thing called life. 

Mail art is important. It might be crucial. I dont know. Time will tell.

https://neuralhorizons.substack.com/p/the-flood-ai-slop-as-a-ddos-o...

The Flood: AI Slop as a DDoS on Attention

Views: 70

Replies to This Discussion

I only skimmed the article myself, so i'm mostly reacting to the general idea here...

I think that's probably where i'm at too: the Pandora's box is already open. AI isn't going away, and neither is the flood of generic crap it can produce.

I still see AI more as an amplifier than the original cause of the problem. If it floods the system with shit, there was already a system pretty well optimized for producing shit. But an amplifier doesn't only amplify the bad stuff... it can also amplify useful things, interesting ideas and genuinely helpful applications (medicine being an obvious example). So i'm not convinced that cultural flattening is inevitable, even if i can totally see why it might happen.

And i agree with you about Mail Art. There is something fundamentally different about making something, putting it in an envelope and sending it directly to another person... no feed, no algorithm, no engagement metrics, just this weird little physical object eventually showing up in someones mailbox. That does feel like a pretty good way of bypassing some of that machinery (and then i still post it on IUOMA or sometimes instagram, lol)

And yes, i'm obviously still feeding some AI-based work into the network, don't see much point in pretending the technology isn't there... i'd rather experiment with it and see what can actually be done with it.

Mail Art might indeed be one of the places where a different logic can survive etc etc. As you said it: time will tell :)

yeah, I like your perspective. it would be (and is) stupid to take an extreme side on this phenomenon. it's happening, like it or not.

as for the potential mass flattening, it is more of visceral dread for me than an idea or opinion. and as ever,  I'd be smarter to keep my eyes open than stick with my expectations. 

one day at a time I guess. thanks for sharing your perspective on this. it is definitely feeding my thoughts

RSS

Support

Want to support the IUOMA with a financial gift via PayPal?

The money will be used to keep the IUOMA-platform alive. Current donations keep platform online till 1-aug-2027. If you want to donate to get IUOMA-publications into archives and museums please mention this with your donation. It will then be used to send some hardcopy books into museums and archives. You can order books yourself too at the IUOMA-Bookshop. That will sponsor the IUOMA as well.

IMPORTANT: please use the friends/family option with donation on Paypal. That makes transaction fee the lowest.

This IUOMA platform on NING has no advertisings, so the funding is completely depending on donations by members. Access remains free for everybody off course

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

© 2026   Created by Ruud Janssen.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service