September 23, 2011 - A few days ago, this wonderful piece of mail-art appeared in my PO box. I have pondered over it, studied it carefully, and cannot solve the mystery of who sent it. Am I overlooking the obvious as I am often prone to do?

 

This is a big collage (8.5" x 11" or A-4) on solid cardboard, reminding me of Erni Baer's (Hamburg, Germany) masterful work. I see a reference to concrete poetry of the typewriter era. The collage includes a very nice piece of concrete-based vispo, proving the artist is familiar with this kind of work. Could this be another masterpiece by Richard Canard (Illinois, USA)? The work is definitely at that level of talent. The reverse side offers even more wonder with some great text about e-mail vs. snail mail correspondence:

 

 

This displays the wry humor and wit of David Stafford (New Mexico, USA). Yet Thom Courcelle (Washington State, USA) is a great writer and artist. He is among the very few who could produce a piece such as this, perfection in all areas, faithfulness in detail. Or - Lord forbid - is this part of Grigori Antonin's new wave and I've been fooled yet again by The Grigster?

 

Regardless, a wonderful piece of mail-art worth sharing. And I ask: Who done it?

 

Views: 461

Tags: Sloan

Comment

You need to be a member of International Union of Mail-Artists to add comments!

Join International Union of Mail-Artists

Comment by Nancy Bell Scott on September 23, 2011 at 2:45pm
Now one has to wonder what work actually made by monkeys would look like. Inquiring minds want to know. Sorry to make more work for you, DVS--it could just be my screen.
Comment by De Villo Sloan on September 23, 2011 at 2:36pm

Great detective work, and many thanks to David for this superb work!

 

Like Lesley, the drawing at the bottom of the second page led me to think it was probably David Stafford. BUT the amazing collage on the front is not his style at all. It's most similar to Erni when you see it, only I've never known Erni to get into concrete poetry. And it looks like Thom's work too. I was not certain at all until "C'est moi." A cliff hanger. It COULD have been Grigori, and I would have had to acknowledge yet again he had created a masterpiece. Long ago, unfortunately, I asserted that GA's work looked as if it had been made by monkeys, and I've been eating humble pie ever since.

 

The text! I was horrifed when I realized you can't read it! It's definitely essential to the piece. I'll attempt a rescan.

Comment by Nancy Bell Scott on September 23, 2011 at 2:12pm
Nice job of deducing, DVS and Magwood. And now a tiny bit more drama: I am dying to read the text but it's just fuzzy enough on my screen that most of it can't be made out. Maybe David could send out cheap fliers ...
Comment by David Stafford on September 23, 2011 at 1:40pm
c'est moi....
Comment by Lesley Magwood Fraser on September 23, 2011 at 1:16pm
And I have just seen one of his quirky little drawings at the bottom, a man fending off a shark attack.
Comment by Lesley Magwood Fraser on September 23, 2011 at 1:15pm
I am guessing David Stafford - looks like his writing in your address... sometimes he forgets to sign his pieces, or maybe he does it on purpose.....

Support

Want to support the IUOMA with a financial gift via PayPal?

The money will be used to keep the IUOMA-platform alive. Current donations keep platform online till 1-july-2024. If you want to donate to get IUOMA-publications into archives and museums please mention this with your donation. It will then be used to send some hardcopy books into museums and archives. You can order books yourself too at the IUOMA-Bookshop. That will sponsor the IUOMA as well.

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

© 2024   Created by Ruud Janssen.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service