August 2011

Rating:
  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 145

Comment

You need to be a member of International Union of Mail-Artists to add comments!

Join International Union of Mail-Artists

Comment by cheryl penn on August 11, 2011 at 9:26am
Vast systems of contradictions juxtaposed with work that breathes with oppositional concepts - I like!! The point? To produce work that leaves space for a viewers to fill in blind spots. Thats what Stewart (????????) thinks anyway :-) X
Comment by De Villo Sloan on August 10, 2011 at 5:14pm
what's the frequency Stewart?
Comment by cheryl penn on August 10, 2011 at 10:43am
DVS has a way of shaking the tree to see what will fall out :-))) - This was a successful shake for sure!  Got to go, there are trolls at my door :-) XX
Comment by De Villo Sloan on August 10, 2011 at 10:43am
And you and Marie are complete opposites in that she tends to build a work around some very basic oppositional concept = absence vs. presence. Cheryl tends to create these vast systems in a work.
Comment by Marie Wintzer on August 10, 2011 at 10:42am
Ok that was too late :-)))
Comment by Marie Wintzer on August 10, 2011 at 10:41am

Before you two "Start" :-)) .... I had to google Quipu because it is so unbelievably interesting

Fascinating!! Did you do research on this? :-o

DVS, nope, absolutely everything was planned and controlled. 

Working on his jaw line :-)))))))))) too funny!!

OK, you two may start now...

Comment by cheryl penn on August 10, 2011 at 10:39am
Complete Control - NO NEVER!!!!! KNOT TRUE!
Comment by De Villo Sloan on August 10, 2011 at 10:36am
It's just that you, Cheryl, and now Cherry Chan always maintain you have this complete control over what you're doing with your art. And I'm always saying: The more I hear an artist proclaiming this, the more likely it is you have large blindspots about what's actually going on and what other people are seeing, thus "You can't handle the truth."
Comment by cheryl penn on August 10, 2011 at 10:31am
Would you like me to start it???? :-))) )X
Comment by De Villo Sloan on August 10, 2011 at 10:27am

Thank you, Cheryl, when I wrote the comment about knot language I had in the back of my mind that some Native American culture had a very refined one - yes, the Inca. Thank you for solving that mystery.

Some things Marie wrote suggested the discussion of artist's intention vs. finding meaning in the work. I would pop if I started that again. Lucky you. I DO think there are things going on in the strings Marie didn't plan or anticipate.

Support

Want to support the IUOMA with a financial gift via PayPal?

The money will be used to keep the IUOMA-platform alive. Current donations keep platform online till 1-februari-2025. If you want to donate to get IUOMA-publications into archives and museums please mention this with your donation. It will then be used to send some hardcopy books into museums and archives. You can order books yourself too at the IUOMA-Bookshop. That will sponsor the IUOMA as well.

IMPORTANT: please use the friends/family option with donation on Paypal. Elon Musk doesn't need any more of our money. If you want buyer protection, add 2 euros

This IUOMA platform on NING has no advertisings, so the funding is completely depending on donations.

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

© 2024   Created by Ruud Janssen.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service