Peter Lipton: faithful philosopher of understanding without explanation.

Rating:
  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 115

Comment

You need to be a member of International Union of Mail-Artists to add comments!

Join International Union of Mail-Artists

Comment by Ian C Dengler on December 6, 2013 at 12:37am

ah! you've solved the riddle! Rising sea levels! Water everywhere! Mists of Confusion! Global Tsunamis (the metaphorical kind as well)=> God's wrath.

Comment by Ian C Dengler on December 6, 2013 at 12:31am

 He argues that understanding can exist in the absence of explanation (robotics; but this argument really depends on how much understanding). Peter Lipton (October 9, 1954 – November 25, 2007) was the Hans Rausing Professor and Head of the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at Cambridge University, and a fellow of King's College, until his unexpected death in November 2007. According to his obituary he now goes about his business  without any explanation at all.

Comment by Ian C Dengler on December 5, 2013 at 10:30pm

she's another of those philosophers I make stamps about

Comment by Ian C Dengler on December 5, 2013 at 9:28pm

everything is a riddle if you haven't decided to quit thinking.

Comment by Valentine Mark Herman on December 5, 2013 at 8:09pm

VMH:

As long as there is hot and cold water for a shower, and a cup of Lipton's tea after, surely no proof of Her existence is necessary?

ICD:

"oh yes another analytic philosophy posting?! they don't like historical sequences very much. She (that great 19th century novel) is a model of Darwinian physics. They do nice, anthropomorphic covers too."

VMH:
"I have some First Day covers. (Are there supposed to be 'riddles' in these stamps?)

Comment by Ian C Dengler on December 5, 2013 at 1:16pm




 Alfred North Whitehead says that all philosophy is just a footnote to Plato, but it would be more appropriate to say that “all philosophy is just a footnote to the history of religions.” Frederic Spiegelberg, Introduction to Comparative Religions (1963) “Any act can become a religious act.” Mircea Eliade.  There are those that divide religion from philosophy; indeed I took a questionnaire today organized by Helen De Cruz, which seems to presume that religion and philosophy are irremedially disparate. You can do the same at:
survey: attitudes and motivations of professional philosophers of religion
https://surveys.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_4UvmgvHInmoRgkR

Support

Want to support the IUOMA with a financial gift via PayPal?

The money will be used to keep the IUOMA-platform alive. Current donations keep platform online till 1-july-2025. If you want to donate to get IUOMA-publications into archives and museums please mention this with your donation. It will then be used to send some hardcopy books into museums and archives. You can order books yourself too at the IUOMA-Bookshop. That will sponsor the IUOMA as well.

IMPORTANT: please use the friends/family option with donation on Paypal. That makes transaction fee the lowest

This IUOMA platform on NING has no advertisings, so the funding is completely depending on donations.

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

Bewaren

© 2024   Created by Ruud Janssen.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service