FlashFlooding

Comment

Comment by Ian C Dengler on November 25, 2013 at 3:12am

Maybe that was the story of the first, lonely life form. Things got better, or more heady, or maybe things went to our heads. There is a reverse interpretation of this stamp: headstrong pride that ignores the needs of the body. Well, it's just a little stamp. I made it on a whim, in a dozen minutes. Probably, I wasn't thinking of all these things.

Comment by Ian C Dengler on November 25, 2013 at 3:02am

haha! men don't exist! It's part of the nothingness paradox: to be a female requires: reproduction in time, space. Technically, all livings are a female argument. There's Mr. Outis from the Odyssey: Homer says his name means No Man, No Nothing at all. You can argue that there are subsets of femaleness, but then, that would just be more divisions of physics--electrical divisions, magnetics, biology.

Comment by Ian C Dengler on November 25, 2013 at 2:56am

yes

Comment by Ian C Dengler on November 25, 2013 at 2:52am

Not passive, active; life begins with swimming lessons, and the first living soul (a female by definition) would be mostly body, or most entirely body. That's chemiosmosis.

Comment by Ian C Dengler on November 24, 2013 at 2:16pm

Maybe this is all about the difficulties of Feminism organizing its own ranks? The Passive Lady Syndrome?

Comment by De Villo Sloan on November 24, 2013 at 12:48pm

Very good, Ian!

Comment by Ian C Dengler on November 24, 2013 at 9:34am

Haha! I suppose that would be very small axons. Very short protein strands. Bourgeois grande? Like a latte with more complex, well-funded proteins? Ah, life is very income related, and there's always some kind of food banking.

Comment by De Villo Sloan on November 24, 2013 at 9:31am

pionnier de l'art postal de la petite bourgeoisie

Comment by Ian C Dengler on November 24, 2013 at 9:22am

Critics of philosophy? That is just more taxons within philosophy. Some maintain that philosophy is a headless academy of logical procedure, a learned Turing success but no more: AI with LaMettrie. And the counter would be perhaps Harry Frankfurt's restatement of the Freedom Paradox that we are actually headless, or at least pretty brainless in the department of responsible phenomenology. The stamp portrays what could be female figures: is this a comment on the seemingly small number of women in academic philosophy? But then, what would be the definition of female as a logic of inclusion? Anything that reproduces itself in time or at least contributes thereto? All would be feminists, derived by individuating circumcision--in this case, class illogic itself.