PREFIX-PREFIXSUFFIX

Comment

Comment by MONTE CON O SIN SAFOS on March 2, 2016 at 2:47am

jist

Comment by Bob Jones on March 2, 2016 at 12:57am

"Please feel free to delete this message"

Comment by Bob Jones on March 2, 2016 at 12:56am

Dear administrators is MONTE CON O SIN SAFOS a fink, a jerk,or a twerp ?

Comment by tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE on February 29, 2016 at 10:23am

I dreamt I saw Bob Jones shaking hands with David A. Bannister in a Maidenform Bra while watching their favorite Alan Smithee movie.

Comment by tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE on February 28, 2016 at 9:45pm

Immediately, this creates problems such as: Does the word "jism" qualify for deletion because "ism" is in it?  Or does it qualify for non-deletion because "ism" is NOT a suffix in this instance.  Decisions, decisions.    

Comment by tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE on February 28, 2016 at 9:42pm

Since this is the "PREFIX-PREFIXSUFFIX" group & since this group name references anti-neoism I'm beginning to think that the power of negative thinking might justify each member of the group deleting any comment that uses a pet peeve prefix or suffix.  For example: I might decide that I have a PASSIONATE detestation for the suffix "ism" & I might delete every comment that uses it.

Comment by tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE on February 28, 2016 at 5:26pm

Now that every member is an administrator here at least one whole conversation has been deleted.  The power of negative thinking.  

Comment by Bob Jones on February 27, 2016 at 3:20pm

I have a complete set of the Laviada viewer schematics if anyone is interested

Comment by MONTE CON O SIN SAFOS on February 27, 2016 at 6:46am

if it is defined it isn't neoist

Comment by tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE on February 25, 2016 at 6:41pm

Has it ever occurred to you that Ed Lefko may've had an ethical relapse & that the secret purpose of this group is to distract you while history changes behind your very back?!

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• Next ›
• Page