PREFIX-PREFIXSUFFIX

Comment

Comment by MONTE CON O SIN SAFOS on March 28, 2016 at 5:45am

I think my being truly Frank may be a step in the right direction here, yes, I am a wiener, a moderately sized pink one with a few tricks only an aging dog bitten by a few bitches could limp away from. 

I've not cut my teeth on neoism.  I was teething well after some of (what I can gather) as its most vibrant times (I was probably too old in the 1970's to be cool with the D.B's anyway). Seeing the timelessness of it and seeing that the "post" neoist group seemed a good pun, but, not the nest I wanted to be stung by I splashed an impulsive alcoholic load in the form now dancing around a tired iron.

My interest in Neoism has been one that is advantages to my observations of nearly every narrative I'm capable of exploring, even my own; antineoism, well, you get the static. The settling dust of it... in its worst form, something similar to a HOME T.V. game show where folks pinch the air in transparent cages for wavering bills with dead terrorists on their faces... at its finer points (for me and at the moment) the occasional sinking of my little fishing boat at having a whale tug at the net.

Comment by tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE on March 27, 2016 at 11:16pm

Not to be outdone in grandiosity, not only is there no need to wish Neoism well, there's no need to even consider ourselves to be anything more than tiny parasitic microbes infesting Neoism's non-existence.  No matter how bloated we get on its PREFIX-PREFIX-SUFFIXNESS it will still have more IX & NESS than the 7 X 9th Loch Ness monster.

Comment by MONTE CON O SIN SAFOS on March 27, 2016 at 10:58pm

Is there any need to wish Neoism well at IUOMA? It was here, as it was everywhere, before we ourselves came into existence and it can do without the lot of us.  It will always exist and will do without us all together.  It can even do without existing, for it dos not even need to exist in order to exist...

p.s. To be Frank (a pseudonym of Monty), and not fatally serious (thanks tENT) I don't know where I was taking this post-script.

Comment by Bob Jones on March 27, 2016 at 8:42pm

"Seriousness IS death ..."

Comment by tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE on March 27, 2016 at 8:29pm

What a Ruud comment!

Comment by Ruud Janssen on March 27, 2016 at 8:25pm

yes, told you so. It is in the numbers!

Comment by tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE on March 27, 2016 at 8:20pm

I will say, however, that once upon a time when men were men & neoists were neoists this is the kind of thing they might have done even thought this is NOT a neoist action: https://youtu.be/fIr1_U-dDHI

Comment by tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE on March 27, 2016 at 8:16pm

It's absolutely impossible to be either for or against neoism.  Anyone who believes they are either has no idea what neoism is.  Anyone who has any idea of what neoism is has no idea what neoism is.  It is, however, absolutely false for me to claim that I have any idea what I'm talking about. This is NOT a paradox.  Or even a rose colored.

Comment by Bob Jones on March 27, 2016 at 8:10pm

"Don't worry Julia ...everybody in this group is slightly confused ..."

Comment by Julia Dixon on March 27, 2016 at 8:01pm

I am slightly confused. Is this group pro or anti neoist?

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• …
• 6
• Next ›
• Page